MSc Mathematical Sciences Exam Conventions 2025-26

18. Appendix C Dissertations Qualitative Descriptors

Dissertations will be assessed with reference to the following qualitative descriptors.

90-100  Work of potentially publishable standard, as evidenced by originality or insight. The work should show depth and accuracy, and should have a clear focus.  It is likely to go beyond the normal MSc level.  
80-89 Work in this range will be at the level of a strong candidate for a DPhil applicant.  It will have depth, accuracy and a clear focus. It will show a strong command of material at least at the MSc level. It is likely to contain original material, which may take the form of new mathematical propositions, new examples, or new calculations, for example.
70-79 The work submitted is of a generally high order, with depth, clarity and accuracy, but may have minor errors in content and/or deficiencies in presentation. It may contain original material, at least in the sense of new examples or calculations.
60-69 The candidate shows a good grasp of their subject, but without the command and clarity required for first class marks. Presentation, referencing and bibliography should be good, and the mathematics/statistics should have no more than minor errors.
50-59  The work shows an adequate grasp of the subject, but is likely to be marred by having material at too low a level, by serious or frequent errors, a high proportion of indiscriminate information, or poor presentation and references.
40-49  The candidate shows reasonable understanding of parts of the basic material, but reveals an inadequate competence with others.  The material may be at too low a level.  There are likely to be high levels of error or irrelevance, muddled or superficial ideas, or very poor writing style. 
30-39 The candidate shows some limited grasp of at least part of the material.
0-29 Little evidence of understanding of the topic.  The work is likely to show major misunderstanding and confusion.